<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>caseychan</title><link>http://caseychan.kinja.com</link><description></description><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[What Online Scams Would Look Like If They Were Real People]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-online-scams-would-look-like-if-they-were-real-peo-508003494</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AThjAHemJ1o?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-AThjAHemJ1o"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">When we see Nigerian princes or weird links or invasive people who want to much personal information pop up in our e-mail inbox, we immediately know that they're scams. It's part of the Internet. But what if it was a part of real life too? It would be absolutely terrifying to see online scams and viruses as people.</p>
<p>Hapstance Films created the short 'The Inbox' and even when you think you're clear of all scams and viruses, one will always sneak right in. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=AThjAHemJ1o" target="_blank">Hapstance Films</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">watch this</category><category domain="">humors</category><category domain="">scams</category><category domain="">online scam</category><category domain="">virus</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508003494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO Picked Up That Silicon Valley TV Show That Might Be Good]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/hbo-picked-up-that-silicon-valley-tv-show-that-might-be-507941497</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/187ugjb4z3p1cjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">We <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5966992/hbo-greenlights-silicon-valley-comedy-by-mike-judge-that-could-actually-be-good">heard last year</a><inset id="5966992"></inset> that HBO had greenlit a dark, single camera Silicon Valley comedy show pilot by Mike Judge (Office Space) but with the blink and you'll miss it nature of TV pilots, you never know what's going to happen until it hits the airwaves. Well, it's going to air. Deadline reports that HBO has picked it up and ordered a series.</p>
<p>The pilot starred TJ Miller, Thomas Middleditch, Josh Brener, Lindsey Broad, Amanda Crew, Angela Trimbur, Zach Woods and more. We don't know much about the show other than that it's by the Office Space guy (good), it's on HBO (even better) and it's not that stupid Bravo reality show (the best thing to not be). [<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/hbo-picks-up-mike-judges-silicon-valley-comedy-to-series/" target="_blank">Deadline</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">television</category><category domain="">tv shows</category><category domain="">mike judge</category><category domain="">silicon valley</category><category domain="">hbo</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 03:43:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507941497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[What New York City Would Look Like on Other Planets]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-new-york-city-would-look-like-on-other-planets-507921294</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nwtdfy5a7u0jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">The most iconic skyline in the world (or at least in America) would look completely different if it was on another world. On Venus, New York City would be a yellow haze, on Mercury would look glow in the dark, on Mars would make everything rusty and on Uranus and Neptune would totally obliterate the city.</p>
<p>Artist Nickolay Lamm (and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5938363/this-is-what-the-ipad-mini-might-look-like">friend of Gizmodo</a><inset id="5938363"></inset>!) of <a href="http://www.storagefront.com/therentersbent/new-york-city-with-atmospheres-of-different-planets" target="_blank">StorageFront.com</a> teamed up with astrobiologist Marilyn Browning Vogel to create this stunning series for Wired. His explanation for what NYC would look like on Mercury:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mercury has but a thin envelope of gas that barely qualifies as an atmosphere. The inexorable solar wind continually strips the planet of any gases that might be captured or retained by gravity. The tenuous atmosphere consists primarily of hydrogen making the atmosphere transparent to the darkness of space and the withering radiance of the nearby Sun. The solar wind interacts with the planet’s magnetic field to blast columns of dust and charged particles up into the atmosphere that then become a comet-like tail, evident as the sparkling haze shown in the upper atmosphere. The landscape is perforated with impact craters and covered in volcanic dust, similar to Earth's moon.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="345" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nwub1g2h9e2jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p>You can see more of Lamm's work <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/05/new-york-planets/?pid=6925&amp;viewall=true" target="_blank">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.storagefront.com/therentersbent/new-york-city-with-atmospheres-of-different-planets" target="_blank">Storage Front</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/05/new-york-planets/?pid=6925&amp;viewall=true" target="_blank">Wired</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">art</category><category domain="">planets</category><category domain="">space</category><category domain="">new york city</category><category domain="">weather</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507921294</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[If you like the same TV as tweens, shows on The CW will be coming to Apple TV. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/if-you-like-the-same-tv-as-tweens-shows-on-the-cw-will-507855739</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">If you like the same TV as tweens, shows on The CW will be coming to Apple TV. MacRumors says that full episodes of CW shows will be available next day and users don't need cable authentication. Apps for Apple TV... they have to be coming, right? [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/05/16/cw-strikes-deal-with-apple-to-bring-content-to-apple-tv/" target="_blank">MacRumors</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">tv</category><category domain="">apple tv</category><category domain="">the cw</category><category domain="">tv shows</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507855739</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Most Awesomest Ways to Open a Beer]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-most-awesomest-ways-to-open-a-beer-507829270</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0QmKHfYfovk?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-0QmKHfYfovk"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">One of the most depressing things in the world: having a beer without a bottle opener. The carbonated deliciousness is looking at you through the glass, teasing you, popping your tastebuds. But of course, you don't need a bottle opener to open a beer. With the right amount of leverage, anything can open a bottle of beer. Just watch this video.</p>
<p>I remember using a park bench to open a bottle but ended up cracking it in half. Like most young pups who don't have access to such liquid gold at all times, I still drank it. But that's not even crazy enough for this video. People use skateboards, motorcycle wheels, golf clubs, guns, parrots, chainsaws, pizzas, helicopters and more to pop open a beer. You're going to be pretty thirsty after watching this video. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QmKHfYfovk&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">Clip Nation</a> via <a href="http://theawesomer.com/many-ways-to-open-a-beer/233492/" target="_blank">The Awesomer</a>] </p>]]></description><category domain="">beer</category><category domain="">booze</category><category domain="">bottle opener</category><category domain="">beers</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:16:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507829270</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[If Vine Tried to Make a Commercial About Vine Using Vine]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/if-vine-tried-to-make-a-commercial-about-vine-using-vin-507752960</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/LUuVgarbROE?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-LUuVgarbROE"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">Because Twitter wants to force lightning twice with self-imposed limitations on communication, Vine has been awkwardly limited to 6 seconds of video. But what does that 6 seconds mean? Could Vine promote Vine in 6 seconds? Could you explain what Vine is in 6 seconds? Is 6 seconds longer or shorter than you think?</p>
<p>The Kids Table Comedy poked fun of Vine's limitations by showing what would happen if Vine wanted to make a commercial about Vine using Vine. So meta! If you can't make a commercial about your product using your product, what do you have? [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=LUuVgarbROE" target="_blank">The Kids Table Comedy</a> via <a href="http://laughingsquid.com/what-if-vine-made-a-commercial-for-vine-using-vine/" target="_blank">Laughing Squid</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">humor</category><category domain="">vine</category><category domain="">parody</category><category domain="">twitter</category><category domain="">commercials</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507752960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here Are What the Google Glass Prototypes Looked Like]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/here-are-what-the-prototypes-of-google-glass-looked-lik-507193147</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18ntc9i38ql8zjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">Wearing Google Glass might make you look weird but it's certainly a lot better than any of the prototypes that Google first tried out. Google Project Glass Staff Hardware Engineer Jean Wang showed off a slide revealing the earliest prototypes of Glass and they're a lot bulkier with open ribbons, chips, gigantic cameras and more. You'd look like a total robot wearing these.</p>
<p>Wang also revealed some of the first steps in creating Glass, which was not unlike to strapping cellphones to the side of your face and using literal helmet cams to get the same effect. Gotta love getting a behind the scenes look on what the future (hilarious how not futuristic it looks, though).</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="356" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18ntejhtm7idxpng/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=CO9I3bikFuY#!" target="_blank">Google Developers</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/dannysullivan/status/334847291271835650" target="_blank">@DannySullivan</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/15/visualized-google-glass-prototypes/" target="_blank">Engadget</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">prototypes</category><category domain="">glass</category><category domain="">google glass</category><category domain="">project glass</category><category domain="">google</category><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507193147</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seeing Google Glass from a Toddler's Perspective Is So Adorable]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/seeing-google-glass-from-a-toddlers-perspective-is-so-507140408</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/O9aNzzWv_iM?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-O9aNzzWv_iM"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">The best thing about Google Glass might be its ability to give anyone a perspective they never see anymore. Whether it's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/pov-hockey-with-google-glass-is-better-than-rinkside-se-487240083">intensity of playing hockey</a><inset id="487240083"></inset> or uh, the weirdness of <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/oh-god-robert-scoble-is-wearing-his-google-glasses-in-t-483864014" target="_blank">being someone else in the shower</a><inset id="483864014"></inset>, it's like a less obtrusive GoPro camera seeing what people's eyes see. This might be the best perspective though: a toddler.</p>
<p>Google Glass from the eyes of a toddler is just absolutely adorable. Chris Angelini attached Google Glass to his two-year-old and let his kid go wild with it. You can see the world as he sees it: fresh, curious, low to the ground and in desperate need of juice (preferably through a cup with a straw). It's so honest.</p>
<p>Angelini's two-year-old's reactions on Google Glass range from &quot;Mom! Look at my cool glasses!&quot; to &quot;cool gwasses&quot; to &quot;I'm done. They're hot&quot;. It's nice to be a kid again and be just as amazed with apple juice, Lego, footballs and Google Glass. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=O9aNzzWv_iM" target="_blank">Chris Angelini</a> via <a href="http://videos.digg.com/post/50529995135/google-glass-from-the-eyes-of-a-toddler-im" target="_blank">Digg Videos</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">google glass</category><category domain="">child</category><category domain="">aww</category><category domain="">point of view</category><category domain="">watch this</category><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507140408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[why is it that beer slush is so not good when flavored slushies are delicious]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/why-is-it-that-beer-slush-is-so-not-good-when-flavored-507144033</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">why is it that beer slush is so not good when flavored slushies are delicious</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:04:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507144033</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[oh man, if i saw this while still drunk/hungover, my brain would probably melt]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/oh-man-if-i-saw-this-while-still-drunk-hungover-my-br-507143645</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">oh man, if i saw this while still drunk/hungover, my brain would probably melt</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507143645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Definitely agree with you and i don't want to sound like a judgmental prick but surely a person's un]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/definitely-agree-with-you-and-i-dont-want-to-sound-like-507142332</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Definitely agree with you and i don't want to sound like a judgmental prick but surely a person's understanding for something this serious should be more than just craigslist</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:00:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507142332</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[All the Fake Websites from Doctor Who Make Me Wish They Were Real]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/all-the-fake-websites-from-doctor-who-make-me-wish-they-507128442</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/i0L5NU1K2vM?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-i0L5NU1K2vM"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">TV show websites are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5993764/all-the-best-fake-websites-tv-shows-have-dreamed-up">notoriously bad</a><inset id="5993764"></inset> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5994697/the-fake-websites-of-law--order-are-so-stupid-i-wish-they-were-real">comically unreal</a><inset id="5994697"></inset> yet I can't help but be charmed by their hilarious simplicity (and god awful horribleness). Can you imagine if there were giant flashing RED ALERT messages popping up at you? Or if hacking was as simple as just slapping the keys on the keyboard a few times? I want to exist in this world of fake websites.</p>
<p>This mash-up video, made by Slacktory and edited by Debbie Saslaw, shows off all the fake websites and apps that pop up on Doctor Who. Can you imagine if we lived with such horrible websites in real life? We'd probably be a lot more productive! As an aside, seeing CRT monitors kind of hurts my soul. Those things were ridiculous. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=i0L5NU1K2vM" target="_blank">Slacktory</a>]</p>
]]></description><category domain="">websites</category><category domain="">watch this</category><category domain="">doctor who</category><category domain="">fake websites</category><category domain="">tv shows</category><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:35:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507128442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Mom Tried to Sell Her Three-Year-Old Son on Craigslist]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/a-mom-tried-to-sell-her-three-year-old-son-on-craigslis-507076764</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nste1t222fipng/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">A bicycle. An old jailbroken iPhone. Maybe used furniture. Some free dirt. Those are the type of things you expect to buy off Craigslist. You definitely don't expect a Mom to offer up her three-year-old son on the seedy but useful classifieds website. But that's just what Stephanie Redus did. She used Craiglist to get her son adopted by a new family.</p>
<p>The Craigslist ad stated:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Hi, I'm trying to adopt out my 3yr old son. I'm not in a good place in my life and don't feel like I can care for him properly but I don't know where to start. If you or know anyone who is interested in caring for him, please let me know. I'm a single mom and can't do this.</p>
<p>Thanks, Desperate.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If Redus, a 29-year-old single mother, didn't feel equipped to continue being a mother to her son, that's totally her decision to make. But to put the adoption alert out on Craigslist? Um. Yeah. The only thing worse would be if Redus tried to pawn him off at a Flea Market with old stamps, broken typewriters and handmade jewelry. It's clear that a woman who would do this to her son needs a bit of help.</p>
<p>Redus, who admitted to posting the ad, told the police that she has been depressed and suffers from anxiety but hasn't been taken her medication because... she's pregnant with another child. She's been charged with &quot;advertising for placement of a child&quot;, which apparently is a misdemeanor (for now). The three-year-old is now in care with a relative as Redus awaits her day in court. [<a href="http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&amp;id=9101743" target="_blank">KTRK</a> via <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/crime/craigslist-ad-adoption-mom-stephanie-redus/" target="_blank">Daily Dot</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">wtf</category><category domain="">craigslist</category><category domain="">bad parenting</category><category domain="">child</category><category domain="">kids</category><category domain="">horrible</category><category domain="">awful</category><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507076764</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watch Liquid Water Instantly Turn into Ice]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/watch-liquid-water-instantly-turn-into-ice-507061373</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yQYsT3pw0GY?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-yQYsT3pw0GY"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">Turning water into ice usually takes a lot of time. Not for this guy though, he magically turns liquid water into frozen ice. It's instantaneous! Seriously, just watch water get poured from the bottle and then freeze immediately. What kind of sorcery is this?</p>
<p>The trick is getting the water to just about freezing in the freezer. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQYsT3pw0GY&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">Grant Thompson</a>, the mastermind behind the video, put an unopened bottle of water in the freezer for about an hour and a half to two hours to get the perfect temperature. Then after the water is supercooled, he pours the almost freezing water over ice and watches it immediately transform into ice as it touches the ice cube. It's a fun little trick that'll blow your friends minds. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQYsT3pw0GY&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">Grant Thompson</a> via <a href="http://theawesomer.com/instant-ice/233247/" target="_blank">The Awesomer</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">watch this</category><category domain="">water</category><category domain="">ice</category><category domain="">liquid</category><category domain="">frozen</category><category domain="">science experiments</category><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507061373</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google wants Microsoft to remove the YouTube app in Windows Phone 8 because it doesn't show any ads.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/google-wants-microsoft-to-remove-the-youtube-app-in-win-507020140</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Google wants Microsoft to remove the YouTube app in Windows Phone 8 because it doesn't show any ads. Understandable! But Microsoft says it would be happy to include advertising in the YouTube app... if Google gave Microsoft the proper APIs. Round and around we go.  [<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/15/4334030/google-demands-microsoft-remove-youtube-windows-phone-app" target="_blank">Verge</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">youtube</category><category domain="">windows phone</category><category domain="">microsoft</category><category domain="">google</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:29:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507020140</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Your Body Will Do in the Next 30 Seconds]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-your-body-will-do-in-the-next-30-seconds-507008331</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/36Fq2zZ0Syg?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-36Fq2zZ0Syg"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">You might think 30 seconds is pretty short. Your body doesn't though. In order to keep everything running, there's a lot of things going on in those 30 seconds. Like you'll make 72 million red blood cells! And shed 174,000 skin cells! And have 25 thoughts. The human body, what a wonderful thing. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=36Fq2zZ0Syg" target="_blank">BuzzFeed Video</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">science</category><category domain="">humans</category><category domain="">body</category><category domain="">cells</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">507008331</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[A 2,300 Year Old Mayan Pyramid Was Destroyed for a New Road]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/a-2-300-year-old-mayan-pyramid-was-destroyed-for-a-new-506202222</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">In your horrific bulldozing news of the day, a construction company found it to be a good idea to destroy one of Belize's largest Mayan pyramids just so they can use its materials for crushed rock in a road-building project. The 2,300 year old pyramid survived Mother Nature but fell to idiot man. Nice.</p>
<p>The Nohmul pyramid, which is one of the most important sites in northern Belize (near the Mexico border), didn't look as polished as what you imagine a pyramid to look like because it lacked &quot;the even stone sides frequently seen in reconstructed or better-preserved pyramids&quot;. But still, if you're destroying something over a 100-foot tall that is clearly not man-made, you probably should ask for permission first.</p>
<p>Jaime Awe, head of the Belize Institute of Archaeology, said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;Just to realize that the ancient Maya acquired all this building material to erect these buildings, using nothing more than stone tools and quarried the stone, and carried this material on their heads, using tump lines. To think that today we have modern equipment, that you can go and excavate in a quarry anywhere, but that this company would completely disregard that and completely destroyed this building.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently it's a common problem in Belize (the destruction of Maya sites for road fill) but no one has ever destroyed a pyramid so large before. There's a time and place to move forward from the past but if something is still standing from 2,300 years ago and you're just using it for road fill, um, you should find something else.</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18npjxygqtiekjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p>[<a href="http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/14/18249751-2300-year-old-maya-pyramid-bulldozed-for-belize-road-project?lite" target="_blank">AP</a>, Image Credit: AP]</p>]]></description><category domain="">wtf</category><category domain="">bulldozers</category><category domain="">pyramids</category><category domain="">maya</category><category domain="">mayan</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506202222</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Haha, Watch a Taser Do Absolutely Nothing to a Candle]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/haha-watch-a-taser-do-absolutely-nothing-to-a-candle-506153501</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EWDbbDG7F6A?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-EWDbbDG7F6A"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">I don't know why I enjoy this quick little video so much but I've watched it over and over. It's probably because anything involving a taser is always hilarious unless you're the person the taser wants to involve. It's probably also because even though a taser can turn a grown man into a baby, it cannot do anything to a candle. I mean nothing. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=EWDbbDG7F6A" target="_blank">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://boingboing.net/2013/05/13/you-cannot-light-a-candle-with.html" target="_blank">BoingBoing</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">stupid</category><category domain="">tasers</category><category domain="">candle</category><category domain="">taser</category><category domain="">electricity</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506153501</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[No One Wants to Download Your App When They Go to Your Website]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/no-one-wants-to-download-your-app-when-they-go-to-your-506136111</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18npaj4vv1om8jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">There's a tedious balance between using apps on your smartphone or just using the browser. Sometimes like in the case of Google Maps or The Weather Channel, apps are better. Other times when you're just dropping quickly into an online dictionary or a silly link, you just want to use the browser. The problem with that though is those stupid websites stupidly bombard you with stupid notifications to download their stupid app!</p>
<p>It's a pain in the ass when you have to come to a full stop because of an alert trying to get you to download their app instead of use their perfectly fine mobile website. Terence Eden feels your pain. He created the hilarious <a href="http://idontwantyourfuckingapp.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">I Don't Want Your Fucking App</a> tumblr to keep track of all the horrors of invasive app advertising. He explains:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Any modal message—full-screen or alert—that interrupts user flow to ask them to download your app suffers from #doorslam #ux antipattern.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I mean it's not unlike stepping into a store and getting bombarded with difficult to close pop up messages and impossible to avoid people pressuring you to sign yourself to the store's rewards card (that you have no intention of ever using). Or like walking into a restaurant and having the waiter stuff food down your mouth (actually that would be great, never mind). Do people really download these useless apps? Here's an example of how Eden tears down these silly notifications:</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="810" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18npbk8nmg5p6png/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear Rotten Tomatoes, “Cancel to continue” - really?</p>
<p>Look, I’m trying to read a moview review quickly. I don’t want to have to piss about installing an app and then trying to find the fucking movie I was looking for in the first place.</p>
<p>I don’t want your fucking app.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Check out more hilarity <a href="http://idontwantyourfuckingapp.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">here</a>. Hopefully the companies who do this will realize that no one wants to download their app. Mobile websites are made for a reason!  [<a href="http://idontwantyourfuckingapp.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">I Don't Want Your Fucking App</a> via <a href="http://thenextweb.com/shareables/2013/05/12/this-tumblr-says-what-everyone-is-thinking-i-dont-want-to-download-your-app/" target="_blank">The Next Web</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">humor</category><category domain="">apps</category><category domain="">mobile websites</category><category domain="">dumb apps</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 02:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506136111</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[What the Future of Google Glass Could Look Like]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-the-future-of-google-glass-could-look-like-506075349</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S80mE3kQTJ0?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-S80mE3kQTJ0"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="first-text">Right now, Google Glass is just a pair of weird looking specs that's pretty much only used to take blurry photos and Instagram selfies. And that's okay! The real promise is what comes next. Developers have been getting their hands on Google Glass and have begun to see what they can build with it. It's the base for the future.</p>
<p>Playground Inc. imagined what Google Glass would look like in the future. Not today's Explorer edition, but a concept of what it can be in a few years when wide ranging apps have been developed to take advantage of Glass' unique technology. It's not unlike comparing the iPhone today to what it first was way back in 2007 (a third party app-less phone that just showed you basic stuff like your calendar, the weather, photos, notes, etc.).</p>
<p>And though Glass will forever be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5989060/how-every-guy-will-use-google-glass">easy to mock</a><inset id="5989060"></inset>, it sure as hell looks like it'll give me a future I'll enjoy (other than that giving emergency CPR to your dad bit) . [<a href="http://playgroundinc.com/blog/the-future-of-google-glass/" target="_blank">Playground Inc</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">google glass</category><category domain="">concepts</category><category domain="">google</category><category domain="">glass</category><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506075349</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some Guy Went on an Insanely Destructive Rampage on a Bulldozer]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/some-guy-went-on-an-insanely-destructive-rampage-on-a-b-505126527</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nlzo8hswt7wjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">Holy crap. You know in Grand Theft Auto when you're trying to destroy everything—cars, homes, the entire street—in your way while racking up as many police officers on your tail just for giggles? That actually happened in real life. A 51-year-old man went on a ridiculous rampage on his bulldozer destroying four homes, smashing cars and cutting power to thousands of people.</p>
<p>Barry Alan Swegle apparently was &quot;highly agitated&quot; at his neighbors and took his logging bulldozer to raze hell on his neighbors in Port Angeles, Washington. It looks pretty much like a war zone.</p>
<p>Neighbors suggest that Swegle went on his demolition streak with his International Harvester TD-25 because of a property line dispute that had been &quot;brewing for some time&quot;. Swegle has been booked into county jail for first degree malicious mischief (which sounds like a pretty hilarious crime).</p>
<p>Just check out the destruction:</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="480" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nlzxpu3v8hnjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="480" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nlzz16zjho5jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="480" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nm00cjqt6qzjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="480" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nm01c27mxa7jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="480" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nm029lrvcsyjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20130510/NEWS/130519999/3rd-update-8212-port-angeles-man-on-rampage-damages-four-homes" target="_blank">Peninsula Daily News</a>, <a href="http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020963706_homesdestroyedxml.html" target="_blank">Seattle Times</a> via <a href="http://boingboing.net/2013/05/13/enraged-man-goes-on-bulldozer.html" target="_blank">BoingBoing</a>, Image Credits: AP]</p>]]></description><category domain="">wtf</category><category domain="">bulldozers</category><category domain="">heavy machinery</category><category domain="">destruction</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505126527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[I wish he showed up too]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/i-wish-he-showed-up-too-505077891</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">I wish he showed up too</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505077891</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yep.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yep-505077841</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yep.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:04:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505077841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soyuz Capsule Returns Chris Hadfield and Crew Safely Back to Earth]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/commander-chris-hadfield-and-crew-have-landed-safely-on-505060869</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="361" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nls655irohgjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/how-chris-hadfield-made-us-care-about-astronauts-again-504479419">After inspiring all of us on Earth</a><inset id="504479419"></inset>, Commander Chris Hadfield and crew have finally re-joined us here. The Soyuz space capsule landed safely at 10:31 PM EDT in Kazakhstan. Hadfield had spent 144 days on the ISS, 2,336 orbits around the planet and totaled up around 62 million miles. That's a lot of miles!</p>
<p>The Soyuz capsule landed vertically, which is the preferred position. The crew, which includes <a href="http://gizmodo.com/a-supercut-of-all-of-astronaut-chris-hadfields-best-mo-504700796">Canadian Astronaut Chris Hadfield</a><inset id="504700796"></inset>, NASA astronaut Tom Marshburn and Russian cosmonaut Roman Romanenko, are back on Earth and reportedly all feeling good as they re-adjust to the gravity. Marshburn was one of the astronauts who performed the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/these-photos-from-todays-emergency-spacewalk-are-total-502301450">awe-inspiring emergency spacewalk</a><inset id="502301450"></inset> to fix the leak of ammonia coolant two days ago.</p>
<p>The landing of the capsule comes a little over three hours since the capsule undocked from the ISS. It marks the end of the ISS' Expedition 35 Crew in space. The crew will head over to the medical tent to get all properly tested and fixed for normal Earth life. Or as normal life can be in the eyes of men who were in space.</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe scrolling="no" mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.ustream.tv/embed/6540154?v=3&amp;wmode=direct" id="ustream-6540154"></iframe></span></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="472" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nluv1kchqewjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="352" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nluhw0x3p6cpng/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>]]></description><category domain="">space</category><category domain="">nasa</category><category domain="">chris hadfield</category><category domain="">soyuz</category><category domain="">iss</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505060869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Can We Build with All the Lego Bricks in the World?]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-can-we-build-with-all-the-lego-bricks-in-the-world-505033576</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nlnr590qn38png/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">Since 1958, 472 billion Lego bricks have been made. And even though most of those bricks are hardly bigger than your finger, 472 billion of anything is a ridiculous number. So what could you build with all the Lego bricks in the world? Surprisingly a lot. Like 74 Empire State buildings a lot.</p>
<p>There really needs to be more huge Lego structures in the world. Hell, there just needs to be more Lego in everyones life.</p>
<p>Imagine it, if 50,000 Lego bricks could create a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5910115/korean-toddlers-build-tallest-lego-tower-in-the-world">104-foot tall Lego Tower</a><inset id="5910115"></inset>, 472 billion could practically build you a spaceship. Or a bridge to space. Of course, the Lego bridge <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5965451/how-tall-can-a-lego-tower-be-before-it-crushes-itself">might just end up crushing itself</a><inset id="5965451"></inset> but hey, whatever, more Lego is always good.</p>
<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="3167" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nlnsemk22zxpng/ku-xlarge.png" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.movoto.com/blog/novelty-real-estate/lego-infographic/" target="_blank">Movoto</a> via <a href="http://designtaxi.com/news/357565/Infographic-What-Can-We-Build-With-All-The-LEGO-Bricks-Ever-Made/" target="_blank">DesignTAXI</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">lego</category><category domain="">infographic</category><category domain="">lego bricks</category><category domain="">buildings</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:04:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505033576</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Chan]]></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>